The IPMAT Indore 2025 exam, held on 12 May 2025, offered a comprehensive test of candidates' quantitative and verbal aptitude through a two-hour online format. The paper featured three sections, each with a 40-minute time limit, and was overall rated as moderate to difficult. The Quantitative Ability (MCQ) section stood out as the most challenging due to its lengthy and calculation-heavy questions, while the Short Answer section was comparatively easier. The Verbal Ability section included a mix of easy to moderate questions, with an unexpected third reading comprehension passage that surprised many test-takers.
Here, you'll find a detailed breakdown of the question paper of IPMAT Indore 2025, including its difficulty level, important topics, and the number of good attempts to aim for.

IPMAT Exam Analysis 2025 Highlights
You can check the highlights of difficulty levels of IPMAT exam analysis 2025:
| Section | Level of Difficulty |
| Quantitative Aptitude (MCQs) | Moderate to Difficult |
| Quantitative Aptitude (SA) | Moderate |
| Verbal Ability | Moderate |
| Overall | Moderate |
IPMAT Question Paper Analysis 2025
As per the IPMAT 2025 exam analysis, the overall difficulty level was rated moderate to tough. Many students found the Quantitative Ability (MCQ) section to be the most difficult part of the exam. The question paper was also noted for being lengthy and tricky, requiring strong time management and problem-solving skills.
IPMAT Analysis 2025 for Quantitative Aptitude (MCQ)
Check the table below for IPMAT analysis 2025 for Quantitative aptitude (MCQ):
| Topic | Number of Questions (Approx.) |
| Data Interpretation | 5 |
| Remainders | 1 |
| Circles, Triangles, Polygons, Coordinate Geometry | 6 to 8 |
| Simple & Compound Interest, Time and Distance (Lengthy) | 2 |
| Logarithm | 1 |
| Functions and Graphs | 3 to 4 |
| Set Theory | 2 |
| Quadratic Maxima, Minima, and Modulus | 2 |
| AP/GP (Arithmetic/Geometric Progression) | 2 |
| Permutation and Combination | 1 |
| Probability | 1 |
| Total | 30 |
Key Points to Note:
- The Data Interpretation (DI) section was calculation-intensive, involving net sales and comparisons.
- Geometry questions covered a wide range of topics and were time-consuming.
- The Simple and Compound Interest question was based on investment returns and involved lengthy calculations.
- Time and Distance questions were similar to those found in mock tests and previous year papers.
- There were distinct questions based on integers.
- Some students claimed that the Probability question may have been incorrect.
IPMAT Analysis 2025 for Quantitative Aptitude (SA)
Check the table below for IPMAT analysis 2025 for Quantitative aptitude (SA):
| Topic | Number of Questions (Approx.) |
| Logical Reasoning Sets (Based on Grouping) | 3 |
| Logarithm | 2 |
| Matrices | 1 |
| Arithmetic - Time and Work | 1 |
| Permutation and Combination | 1 |
| Linear Equations | 1 |
| Numbers (Perfect Squares based) | 1 |
| Venn Diagrams | 1 |
| Remainder Theorem (Quadratic Equations) | 1 |
| Coordinate Geometry and Trigonometry | 2 |
| GP (Geometric Progression) | 1 |
| Total | 15 |
Key Points to Note:
- The Logical Reasoning section focused on grouping and median-based questions.
- Last year's exam included questions on statistics.
- Linear equations in the Arithmetic section were based on infinite solutions.
- The logarithm question was considered tricky by some students.
- The permutation and combination question involved forming numbers from a given set.
- The matrix question was slightly challenging but manageable.
The remainder theorem question required applying the concept to quadratic equations.
IPMAT Analysis 2025 for Verbal Ability (VA)
Check the following table with IPMAT analysis 2025 for verbal ability:
| Topic | Number of Questions (Approx.) |
| Reading Comprehension (based on Social Media, Economy, Business) | 18 |
| Idioms and Phrasal Verbs | 3 to 4 |
| Paracompletion | 5 |
| Para Jumbles | 5 |
| Grammar-Based Fill-in-the-blanks | 2 |
| Fill in the Blanks | 4 to 5 |
| Sentence Correction | 5 to 6 |
| Total | 45 |
The exam did not include any word usage questions; instead, an additional Reading Comprehension passage was introduced. The Verbal Ability section was lengthy and required significant time to attempt. It featured three RC passages on the following topics:
- Social Media - 6 questions; high difficulty
- Economics - 6 questions; easy
- Business - 6 questions; easy
IPMAT Analysis 2025 Expected Good Score
Based on the IPMAT 2025 exam analysis, refer to the table below to view the estimated good scores and the expected section-wise cutoff marks for the exam.
| Section | Number of Good Attempts | Good Score | Expected IPMAT Cutoff 2025 |
| Quantitative Aptitude (SA) | 9 to 10 | 36 - 40 | 24 to 28 |
| Quantitative Aptitude (MCQ) | 14 to 15 | 48 - 50 | 32 to 36 |
| Verbal Ability | 38 to 40 | 140 - 150 | 102 to 107 |
Enjoy Extra Benefits with SR
Counselling
Processing fees on loan
Discounted Applications
GD PI preparation
Frequently Asked Questions
Ans. The IPMAT Indore 2025 exam was generally considered to be of moderate to high difficulty. While the Verbal Ability and Short Answer sections were manageable, the Quantitative Ability (MCQ) section proved to be the most challenging for many students due to complex and lengthy problems.
Ans. Most students found the Quantitative Ability (MCQ) section to be the toughest. The questions were time-consuming, required multi-step calculations, and tested advanced concepts, making it difficult to attempt all within the allotted time.
Ans. Yes, the Verbal Ability section had a surprise element with three Reading Comprehension (RC) passages, replacing the usual word usage questions. Though two of the RCs were easy, the overall section was lengthy and required careful time management.
Ans. Good attempts were around 9–10 in QA (SA), 14–15 in QA (MCQ), and 38–40 in Verbal. Based on student feedback and expert analysis, expected cutoffs ranged from 24–28 in QA (SA), 32–36 in QA (MCQ), and 102–107 in Verbal Ability.
Ans. Some students claimed that the Probability question in the Quantitative Ability section might have been incorrect or poorly framed. However, no official confirmation has been given, and the final answer key is awaited for clarification.
Are You Interested in IPMAT?










